Final Review of my Objectives and My Progress Through This Course: 17 September 2020
This post also forms the basis of my submission for assessment
“4. A reflective presentation or evaluation reflecting on your work and learning journey as a whole.”
Over the time I have been doing this course I have found I have become more structured in the setting of my personal objectives and my reflections on these. As a result I have found it helpful to incorporate into my learning log a section under “Research and Reflection” titled “My Objectives and Progress”.
In my first post in this section I identified my objectives as being the aims of the course. I also considered my own motivation for taking this course. This I summarised as being “to develop my understanding of contemporary and historical approaches to photography and thereby to produce practical work which uses this understanding” and a secondary aim was “to develop my critical analysis and self-appraisal of ideas, processes and outcomes particularly as related to my own technical and visual skills”.
In the posts of my regular reviews of my objectives I have broken these large scale aims and into more manageable and achievable parts, but will try and return to the larger objectives and review what I have achieved on these.
My Objectives
“to develop my understanding of contemporary and historical approaches to photography and thereby to produce practical work which uses this understanding”
I think the most tangible example of how I have developed a better understanding of my photography comes from my reading about Colour Field artists. I have realised that this style of abstract painting was an influence on the landscape photographer, Franco Fontana. I had been consciously or unconsciously trying to emulate this in images I made before I started the course and show in my log. A more overt understanding of the influence of artists on my photography is illustrated by the comparison I have made between the monochrome landscapes of John Virtue and images I made in response to the landscapes of Don McCullin.
Overall I have found that visiting a gallery to see the work of photographers, tends to make me try to create images in response to those I see. There are many examples of this in my log, where I have shown a reaction to the work of photographers, including Edward Weston, Willy Ronis, Man Ray, Fay Godwin and Don McCullin. While on one level this may seem like merely copying the work of others, I find it has helped me to begin to understand how other photographers see their subject and portray it. My next step is to combine elements of the work of these into my images so as to better express what I want to convey.
“To develop my critical analysis and self-appraisal of ideas, processes and outcomes particularly as related to my own technical and visual skills”
This is an area where I think I still have a lot of work to do. Developing my skills of critical analysis of visual work and subjecting my own work to that critique has been an objective running through all the time I have been doing the course.
I realise that I started out appreciating only a limited range of types of visual art. Gallery visits, particularly to the Peggy Guggenheim collection in Venice, exposed me to a much wider range. While I might have a better understanding of what the artist was trying to achieve (or at least what commentators and curators think the artist was trying to achieve), I still have difficulty appreciating the work otherwise.
A major step towards this however has been a recognition that there can be considered to be different aesthetic codes. In an on-line tutorial with Robert Bloomfield on the subject of Wabi Sabi, I realised that there are many different frameworks against which a visual art work can be appreciated – this was something I had not really considered before. It remains something I need to study more.
My other original objectives were the remaining objectives of the course:
“to use technical and visual skills appropriately”
I believe I have used a range of technical skills to create my work. Initially this was confined to digital images, but I have extended my skills there to do more studio work for still life in my “Collections” assignment and “Homage” exercise.
Skills that I have not practiced in this course and I think I need more work on include formal portraiture and the skills of working with models and other subjects.
I have also done some work on the use of film and processing and printing this. It is much more time consuming and the constraints of time for the course have prevented me from doing more. However I did find this a major learning experience to go back to film and chose to do this assignment with film “as a learning exercise to better understand how Cartier-Bresson and contemporaries worked and to improve my skills of observation and timing”. I have come across the work of contemporary photographers who use film, but I still need to try and understand what their reason is for this.
Overall the quality of some of the final prints is acceptable to me, but there is still a long way to go to improve these.
“To produce practical work which uses the above understanding and demonstrates skills of personal engagement, enquiry, imagination and experimentation”
I do feel engaged in this course of study and have particularly enjoyed interaction with other students and staff at on-line and in person meetings. These have given me better insight into important concepts in visual art and also the work of students from disciplines other than photography.
I think overall that the skills of imagination and experimentation are probably the weakest part of my progress through the course so far. In part this may be because I tend to ask “Why” do something, rather than do it and see what the outcome is. My tendency is to perhaps take an intellectual approach, and plan the images rather than have any scope for the unexpected.
I became aware of this in an on-line tutorial with Robert Bloomfield. He asked “How do you notice that thing you have never seen before?” This captures that issue: I think I tend to over plan the image I am hoping to create, and if I can adopt a more spontaneous style it may lead to more unexpected results.